<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Wee Bit of Wisdom for MBTI Type Practitoners</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.personalityplusinbusiness.com/2009/a-wee-bit-of-wisdom-for-mbti-type-practitoners.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.personalityplusinbusiness.com/2009/a-wee-bit-of-wisdom-for-mbti-type-practitoners.html</link>
	<description>MBTI tips and artful resources for women with that entrepreneurial spark</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 21:58:56 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://www.personalityplusinbusiness.com/2009/a-wee-bit-of-wisdom-for-mbti-type-practitoners.html/comment-page-1#comment-444</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalityplusinbusiness.com/?p=457#comment-444</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by sandymcmullen: Acknowledgment from Hile Rutledge re &quot;Inner Landscapes II: AVisual Guide to the MBTI&quot; in comment on my blog (sw----eet) http://bit.ly/12X29...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by sandymcmullen: Acknowledgment from Hile Rutledge re &#8220;Inner Landscapes II: AVisual Guide to the MBTI&#8221; in comment on my blog (sw&#8212;-eet) <a href="http://bit.ly/12X29..." rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/12X29&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hile Rutledge</title>
		<link>http://www.personalityplusinbusiness.com/2009/a-wee-bit-of-wisdom-for-mbti-type-practitoners.html/comment-page-1#comment-443</link>
		<dc:creator>Hile Rutledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.personalityplusinbusiness.com/?p=457#comment-443</guid>
		<description>As the author/presenter of the webinar that Sandy referenced, I was excited to see that she both had attended and taken such an important nugget away.  Just today I was working with leaders using type, and in this group of mainly Thinking deciders, there was a subtle diminishment of Feeling decision making.  &quot;T&#039;s make tough decisions, and Fs think about the people&#039;s needs.&quot;  The business reality--if this statement were true--is that T is a business necesity and F is a &quot;nice to have&quot; (icing on the cake). If we remember that only the Feeling function can answer the question of what is good or bad--only the Feeling function can be passionate, excited and loyal, for each of these requires subjective attachment and assessment--if we remember these things, we see that F is as much a business requirement as is T.  

It is not F I feel the need to advocate for; it is the practice of making sure that I do everything I can as a trainer/consultant to level a playing field within each dichotomy.  These are playing fields that rarely are level on their own.  Go in armed with examples and data so you can work to balance the scales when so needed (and it will be needed almost always).

And thanks to Sandy for spreading this important idea (and giving us Inner Landscapes--great book Sandy).

Hile Rutledge
OKA
www.typetalk.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the author/presenter of the webinar that Sandy referenced, I was excited to see that she both had attended and taken such an important nugget away.  Just today I was working with leaders using type, and in this group of mainly Thinking deciders, there was a subtle diminishment of Feeling decision making.  &#8220;T&#8217;s make tough decisions, and Fs think about the people&#8217;s needs.&#8221;  The business reality&#8211;if this statement were true&#8211;is that T is a business necesity and F is a &#8220;nice to have&#8221; (icing on the cake). If we remember that only the Feeling function can answer the question of what is good or bad&#8211;only the Feeling function can be passionate, excited and loyal, for each of these requires subjective attachment and assessment&#8211;if we remember these things, we see that F is as much a business requirement as is T.  </p>
<p>It is not F I feel the need to advocate for; it is the practice of making sure that I do everything I can as a trainer/consultant to level a playing field within each dichotomy.  These are playing fields that rarely are level on their own.  Go in armed with examples and data so you can work to balance the scales when so needed (and it will be needed almost always).</p>
<p>And thanks to Sandy for spreading this important idea (and giving us Inner Landscapes&#8211;great book Sandy).</p>
<p>Hile Rutledge<br />
OKA<br />
<a href="http://www.typetalk.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.typetalk.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

